{"id":2775,"date":"2022-06-14T07:45:16","date_gmt":"2022-06-14T06:45:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/codir.net\/?p=2775"},"modified":"2022-06-14T07:50:19","modified_gmt":"2022-06-14T06:50:19","slug":"iran-nuclear-deal-nears-potential-fatal-blow-as-tehran-removes-cameras-watchdog-chief-says%ef%bf%bc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/codir.net\/?p=2775","title":{"rendered":"Iran nuclear deal nears potential \u2018fatal blow\u2019 as Tehran removes cameras, watchdog chief says"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Dismantling the cameras poses a \u2018serious challenge\u2019 to the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BY&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/author\/stephanie-liechtenstein\/\">STEPHANIE LIECHTENSTEIN<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VIENNA \u2014&nbsp;Iran will remove surveillance cameras from key nuclear sites, the U.N. nuclear watchdog head said Thursday, leaving international observers in the dark and imperiling a deal to limit Tehran\u2019s nuclear ambitions.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said dismantling the cameras poses a \u201cserious challenge\u201d to the agency\u2019s work in Iran. Speaking to journalists in Vienna, Grossi warned the agency will be unable to maintain a \u201ccontinuity of knowledge\u201d about Iran\u2019s nuclear program in about three to four weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If that happens, Grossi stressed, it will deliver a \u201cfatal blow\u201d to the Iran nuclear deal, which once restricted Tehran\u2019s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The agreement \u2014&nbsp;formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) \u2014&nbsp;has been badly frayed since the U.S. pulled out in 2018 and negotiations to revive the deal have&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/iran-nuclear-talks-freeze-amid-terrorist-label-spat-even-with-deal-on-the-table\/\">stalled<\/a>&nbsp;in recent weeks.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kelsey Davenport, director for non-proliferation at the Arms Control Association,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/KelseyDav\/status\/1534880334394925056\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">said<\/a>&nbsp;on Twitter that Grossi was not exaggerating: \u201cIf the agency cannot ensure continuity of knowledge about Iran\u2019s program, the IAEA will not be able to implement the JCPOA\u2019s monitoring and verification provision.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A confidential IAEA report sent to member states on Thursday evening and shared with POLITICO on Friday said that the director general is \u201cgravely concerned\u201d by the consequences of Iran\u2019s decision to remove the 27 cameras dedicated to monitoring Iran\u2019s compliance with the JCPOA. The report also says that the decision could have \u201cdetrimental implications\u201d for the IAEA\u2019s \u201cability to provide assurances of the peaceful nature of Iran\u2019s nuclear programme.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The report furthermore explains that once the three- or four-week period expires, \u201cmore stringent safeguards measures\u201d would be required in order for the IAEA to be able to \u201cconfirm the consistency of Iran\u2019s declarations.\u201d<br>This statement implies that if the cameras are not re-installed after four weeks, there could be other measures implemented and Iran could provide other, additional information that would still allow for a restoration of the nuclear deal.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A senior western diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that such measures, for example additional inspections, would have to be devised once this four-week period elapses. But the official also cautioned that it is questionable whether Iran would be open to any such measures.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Iran\u2019s decision to remove the surveillance cameras is retaliation for a resolution the 35-member IAEA board of governors overwhelmingly approved Wednesday night. The measure censured Iran for failing to fully answer questions for over two years about the origins of uranium traces found at several locations inside the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe approval of the foregoing resolution happened based on a hasty and unbalanced report by the IAEA director general,\u201d Iran said in a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.mfa.ir\/portal\/newsview\/682925\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">statement<\/a>&nbsp;Thursday, arguing it had engaged in \u201cconstructive cooperation\u201d with the IAEA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi said later Thursday that Iran \u201cwill not back down even one step from our position,\u201d according to Iranian state-owned media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The 27 cameras Iran will remove have practically all been installed under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal at various facilities in Iran, including an underground Natanz site, an Isfahan site and another location in Tehran.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They are indispensable for the IAEA\u2019s ability to monitor Iran\u2019s production of advanced centrifuges, machines that enrich uranium.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Without the cameras, a gap of crucial information will begin at the moment of removal. The longer this blank space lasts, the more difficult it will become for IAEA inspectors to reconstruct how many advanced centrifuges or how much uranium have been produced. It may also fuel renewed speculation about whether Iran could be diverting nuclear material for covert activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The removal of the cameras comes as Iran is closer than ever to amassing enough highly-enriched uranium for one nuclear weapon. Earlier this week, Grossi acknowledged Iran could reach this point in just a few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But experts also caution it will take Iran longer to actually build a nuclear weapon, if it decides to do so.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Iran will keep in place around 40 surveillance cameras that have been installed under the so-called Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement, a separate legal document unrelated to the JCPOA, under which the IAEA inspectors will retain some access to Iran\u2019s nuclear facilities and its program.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWhether it is aimed at coercion or punishment, Iran\u2019s removal of the cameras fundamentally undermines the logic that it is trying to preserve space for an imminent revival of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and reduces the odds of a deal this year from 55 percent to 40 percent,\u201d said Henry Rome, an Iran analyst with the Eurasia Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Rome also said it is possible Iran is \u201cmaking a last-ditch effort to grasp for token concessions before seriously reviving talks\u201d in Vienna to restore the Iran nuclear deal. \u201cBut this is no longer the most likely option.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"share-this\">\n                    <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share\"\nclass=\"twitter-share-button\"\ndata-count=\"horizontal\">Tweet<\/a>\n                    <script type=\"text\/javascript\"\nsrc=\"http:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\"><\/script>\n                    <div class=\"facebook-share-button\">\n                        <iframe\nsrc=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/plugins\/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fcodir.net%2F%3Fp%3D2775&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=200&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21\"\nscrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;\noverflow:hidden; width:200px; height:21px;\"\nallowTransparency=\"true\"><\/iframe>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dismantling the cameras poses a \u2018serious challenge\u2019 to the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency. BY&nbsp;STEPHANIE LIECHTENSTEIN VIENNA \u2014&nbsp;Iran will remove surveillance cameras from key nuclear sites, the U.N. nuclear watchdog head said Thursday, leaving international observers in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2776,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-features","category-news-analysis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2775"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2775\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2778,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2775\/revisions\/2778"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2776"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/codir.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}